Return to home page
Articles
SUBSCRIPTIONS
subscribe or renew now – click here!
BOOKLETS FOR SALE
buy the 23rd liberator songbook online
liberator booklets
COMMENTARY
commentary 362 – november 2013
RADICAL BULLETIN
radical bulletin 362 – november 2013
LEAD ARTICLE
362 – how to be a liberal minister
LORD BONKERS’ DIARY
lord bonkers’ diary 362
PREVIOUS ISSUES (IN PDF FORMAT)
liberator 361 – september 2013
liberator 360 – august 2013
liberator 359 – june 2013
FEATURES
really facing the future
field guide to the liberal democrats
xmas books 2008
SONGS
song – country garden
FAQS
privacy policy
guide to writing for liberator
LINKS
the really useful links page
Search...
filler graphic
Radical Bulletin 345 – April 2011
08 April 2011 (20:13:04)

MIDSTREAM HORSES

There is no obvious precedent for a conference debate so one-sidedly opposed to the Lib Dem leadership as that at Sheffield on the government’s proposed changes to the National Health Service.

The government’s proposals are neither Liberal Democrat policy nor in the coalition agreement (and, for that matter, are not Conservative policy either). The conference therefore felt no inhibition about saying what it thought.

And it thought that health minister Paul Burstow was talking rubbish. Burstow was unwise to put up a motion that said, in effect, that the government’s proposals were perfect, and he might have expected a tough debate. This, though, was a massacre.

As Evan Harris, John Pugh, John Alderdice, Andrew George and Shirley Williams rubbished the government’s plans to loud applause, it became plainly obvious that the two hostile amendments would be passed easily.

Then something strange happened. Richard Kemp, summing up for the motion, said that the mover (i.e. Burstow) wished to accept both amendments. This might seem odd, given that one of them effectively trashed Burstow’s position. Kemp said later, however, that Burstow had decided to accept both amendments the previous day. Kemp added he had been surprised Burstow didn’t say so in his proposing speech.

If Burstow had accepted the amendments at the outset, it would have taken the heat out of the debate and made it look less like he had been slaughtered by the conference. Did he simply forget this apparently rather important part of his speech?

Also in Radical Bulletin 345:

  • TRIPLES ALL ROUND
  • ANGELS ON A PINHEAD
  • MUSICAL CHAIRS
  • LONDON KILLS ME
  • BOUNDARY SCORED
  • PAPER TIGERS
  • ANIMAL CRACKERS

Click here to return to the home page.
Printable Version
 


copyright ©2004-13 - liberator collective. You may not copy, reproduce, republish, download,
post, broadcast, transmit, make available to the public, or otherwise use liberator
content in any way except for your own personal, non-commercial use